[aprssig] APRS in Atlanta
snslay at swbell.net
Tue Oct 11 21:42:39 CDT 2005
> But name one connection where you NEED to use RF instead of letting the
> internet help the packet along.
Position reports to areas more than 2 digis away!
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not
sure about the
former." Albert Einstein
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stan Coleman [NØYXV]" <n0yxv at gihams.org>
To: "TAPR APRS Mailing List" <aprssig at lists.tapr.org>
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 5:44 PM
Subject: Re: [aprssig] APRS in Atlanta
If you're sending GPS messages getting to the IGate and maybe one or two
is the only thing that's important. If you're trying to send messages from
point A to point B the IGates already know how to get the message to the
party. Why would you want to plug up a 1200 baud RF network when you can use
high speed internet backbone? The internet is not only faster it's
more reliable. While the RF network can have packet collisions the internet
side normally won't.
Please don't take this the wrong way I'm merely trying to get more
But name one connection where you NEED to use RF instead of letting the
internet help the packet along. Now assuming there are NO IGates near you
you might have a valid reason to flood several Digi's with your signal.
visit us online at
Quoting Bill Vodall WA7NWP <wa7nwp at jnos.org>:
> > Now I'm no expert but distance isn't the name of the game here. Contrary
> > to
> > other forms of Ham Radio you DON'T want you signal to go far, you just
> > want
> > to make it to the next IGate. If the nearest IGate is only 2 hops away
> > why
> > your signal 5 or 6 hops away?
> What if you don't care about the IGates? There's still a lot more to
> APRS then the Internet side of things.
> Other then that, you're absolutely correct -- you don't "normally" try
> for DX like other forms of Amateur Radio.
> Bill - WA7NWP
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at lists.tapr.org
aprssig mailing list
aprssig at lists.tapr.org
More information about the aprssig