UI-View Bashing (was Re: APRS RF DX? (Was RE: [aprssig] APRSinAtlanta - flooding the network))
Richard Amirault ramirault at erols.comThu Oct 13 17:03:04 UTC 2005
- Previous message: UI-View Bashing (was Re: APRS RF DX? (Was RE: [aprssig] APRS inAtlanta - flooding the network))
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: Digi-coverage polygon
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ron McCoy" Subject: RE: UI-View Bashing (was Re: APRS RF DX? (Was RE: [aprssig] APRSinAtlanta - flooding the network)) (snip) > Why was PHG set up as a manual entry with static data? It seems like we > have > all the information we need for a digi to dynamically create a coverage > object surrounding it on a map. (snip) Because PHG was "set up" when most folks (if not all folks) were running APRSDos (and some of us still do run that program) Besides, I agree with Bob, PHG is valuable for every fixed station, not just digis. True, it is not necessarily "accurate" but it gives a ballpark idea of the local network and can be very helpful. Richard Amirault N1JDU Boston, MA, USA Go Fly A Kite
- Previous message: UI-View Bashing (was Re: APRS RF DX? (Was RE: [aprssig] APRS inAtlanta - flooding the network))
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: Digi-coverage polygon
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
