[aprssig] PHG and HAAT
Curt Mills archer at eskimo.comFri Oct 14 04:03:01 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] PHG and HAAT
- Next message: [aprssig] PHG and HAAT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, N0YXV - Stan Coleman wrote: > I still somewhat of a newbie so help me out here. How can you get a > negative number for HAAT? Did you dig a hole and put an antenna in it? Pretty close! > It would seam to me the lowest HAAT number you could come up with is > zero. Zero meaning your not gaining anything over the average height of > the surrounding terrain. First of all, I'm in a river valley, about 25' uphill from the water, 156' above MSL. Second of all I'm in a bowl in the river valley, so to drive out of here in either of two directions I have to climb. The hills around me are on average 450' up in any direction. Higher if you go east as I'm in the foothills on the west side of the Cascade mountains. Puget Sound is to my west a few miles. So... My HAAT is -450ft. I had splat! calculate it for me from USGS DEM files. I have a hard time getting out of here on RF. Not exactly a ham's dream location, but it's what I call home. -- Curt, WE7U. archer at eskimo dot com http://www.eskimo.com/~archer Lotto: A tax on people who are bad at math. - unknown Windows: Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates. - WE7U. The world DOES revolve around me: I picked the coordinate system!"
- Previous message: [aprssig] PHG and HAAT
- Next message: [aprssig] PHG and HAAT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
