[aprssig] Re: UI-View Bashing
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduFri Oct 14 16:11:01 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] PHG and HAAT
- Next message: [aprssig] PHG add on for UI-View - elevations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>> steve.jones at rogers.com 10/13/05 7:45 PM >>> >> Thats about 8% . Which is why I used the term >> "only a small percentage" of UIview stations are >> transmitting PHG >No, you said that only a small percentage of >UI-View people are using the add-on. You didn't >mention that to use it they had to be transmitting PHG. >There's probably a fair number of people out >there using the add-on but not transmitting PHG. Reply: 1) That is because there are MORE that are transmitting it than using the add on! So I gave the LARGER value. OK, shall I reduce the 8% to exclude all those stations that have entered a PHG but are not using the add on? 2) If someone has taken the effort to install a PHG add-on to to UIview so that he can see the PHG of other stations, it would violate my understanding of human nature not to expect him to then also not want to transmit his own PHG 3) If a PHG add-on to UIview did not include the simple provision to PROMPT the user to enter his PHG, then I would say the add-on should add this process. Every fixed station has an expressable PHG just like it has a LAT and LONG. Why not enter it and transmit it if you just downloaded the tool to do it with? What difference if it is 4% or 8% or 12%, I was simply making the point that it is still a small number. Thus, the view of APRS to the other 90% or so are not seeing this whole dimension to APRS which is so valuable to local RF performance. Bob, WB4APR
- Previous message: [aprssig] PHG and HAAT
- Next message: [aprssig] PHG add on for UI-View - elevations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
