> Subject: Re: [aprssig] Transmitting data to a hot
Tad Burnett tburnett at vermontel.netWed Oct 19 19:52:36 UTC 2005
- Previous message: > Subject: Re: [aprssig] Transmitting data to a hot
- Next message: > Subject: Re: [aprssig] Transmitting data to a hot
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
But for the control operator to be responsible for the transmitter from a remote location wouldn't he need to also receive the signal...so I guess you could say he was the intended recipient ????? Tad N1QAG Rochte, Robert wrote: >>(One way means there does not have to be an intended recipient.) >> >> > >But if there *is* an intended recipient - and there is, in this case - and >that recipient is not a ham, then it is broadcasting, not telemetry. > >Of course, it all depends upon what the meaning of the word "is" is.... > >_______________________________________________ >aprssig mailing list >aprssig at lists.tapr.org >https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20051019/93ec92ae/attachment.htm
- Previous message: > Subject: Re: [aprssig] Transmitting data to a hot
- Next message: > Subject: Re: [aprssig] Transmitting data to a hot
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
