> Subject: Re: [aprssig] Transmitting data to a hot

Tad Burnett tburnett at vermontel.net
Wed Oct 19 14:52:36 CDT 2005

But for the control operator to be responsible for the transmitter from 
a remote location
wouldn't he need to also receive the signal...so I guess you could say 
he was the intended
recipient ?????

Rochte, Robert wrote:

>>(One way means there does not have to be an intended recipient.)
>But if there *is* an intended recipient - and there is, in this case - and
>that recipient is not a ham, then it is broadcasting, not telemetry.
>Of course, it all depends upon what the meaning of the word "is" is....
>aprssig mailing list
>aprssig at lists.tapr.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20051019/93ec92ae/attachment.html>

More information about the aprssig mailing list