[aprssig] Question about low power APRS in Los Angeles area
Jim Lux jimlux at earthlink.netWed Oct 19 23:37:25 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] Minnesota digi updates.
- Next message: [aprssig] Question about low power APRS in Los Angeles area
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On behalf of Courtney N5BF, I am forwarding this for comments and potential answers. I've inserted some additional information in the middle (in square brackets) to clarify certain local aspects. Here's some background geographical information too: The JPL Amateur Radio Club (JPLARC, W6VIO) has a 220 and 440 repeater on Cerro Negro, which is a hill that has a view of downtown LA as well as La Canada. Coverage map at: http://wr6jpl.ampr.org/cn_lcf.html We also have a 2m site up on the JPL Mesa Antenna range above the lab. Coverage map is at: http://wr6jpl.ampr.org/jpl_mesa.html And, the references to 180 refer to a 9 story building at the West end of the lab where we have a shack on the roof with some UHF and VHF equipment (and a network connection) If you look at the picture here: http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/about_JPL/images/jpl-browse.jpg Bldg 180 is the tall slab-like building at the left side of the picture with vertical white stripes. That picture also shows the Mesa antenna range along the ridgeline directly behind the lab. The N6EX repeater is some 5 miles to the east. From: "Courtney B. Duncan" <courtney.b.duncan AT jpl.nasa.gov> Subject: APRS in Canada/Crescenta To: James.P.Lux AT jpl.nasa.gov Local guidelines for APRS use recommend WIDE2-2 as the best path in SoCal. I observe that this is true for mobiles running something like 25 watts to an outside antenna, even up here in our little valley. I now have experimental evidence that Bicycle or Hiking mobiles (think "HT on high power") in this area are not well served. In half a dozen 30-60 minute bicycling trips through the hills and vales west of JPL, I've managed to get an average of one packet into the network per trip, something like a 3% success rate. Clearly this won't do. Running 25 watts bicycle mobile is problematic and is not a good "routine" solution. Mild research on this subject leads me to believe that using an alternative path of WIDE1-1,WIDE2-1, or RELAY,WIDE2-1, would help me, as a QRP user, by activating localized digis that are meant to fill in holes like ours. I could easily install one of these at my house, but my house doesn't have good views into the Crescenta/Canada valley either. I'm in that hole on the 210 at the Ocean View exit where you start to lose the JPL 2 meter repeater [up on the Mesa antenna range] while westbound. KK6PD operates a RELAY further west, but he is in a worse location than me, nearly under the freeway near Lowell right before you lose all JPL repeaters westbound. We don't need something very high up to help in the valley here, but we do need something that is not at the bottom of a debris basin as KK6PD and I are. I note from my (car) mobile trip raw data that none of the big WIDEn-N stations (the N6EXs and others) are closer than about 20 miles from us here. Though La Crescenta is the "back porch of L.A.", our blockage to the south gives the area unique problems in this network. Like I said, 25 watts mobile works fine, HT on high power barely works at all. From my perspective, one of those big N6EX WIDEn-N stations on Lukens or Cerro Negro would totally fix this. From an L.A. basin network planning perspective, however, this might add too much node crowding. (I don't know this, I'm just speculating.) From my personal perspective, a WIDE1-1 digi in our Building 180 shack, or at the 147.15 site or on the Lund building up in La Canada would fix it too. An aside. It looks like the modern recommendation is to set up localized digis with WIDE1-1 for this. It also looks like, from my study of packet traces that I can see from my house, that if one of the big WIDEn-N guys sees you, even though you have RELAY in your path and even though you haven't been repeated by RELAY*, he will still pick you up and do the next thing, like WIDE2-1. If this is true, then my QRP station should always run WIDE1-1,WIDE2-1 so that if seen either by a localized digi or by WIDEn-N, I'm in. But, it wouldn't help around here because right now there are no WIDE1-1 digis. Using RELAY,WIDE2-1 would work except I lose KK6PD, the only local RELAY, when I turn left out of my driveway. So, here's the question. If the club ran a 144.39 radio at Cerro Negro, on the mesa, or on top of 180, would we configure it for digi use by local QRP stations and if so, how? Or, would it make sense for it to be a WIDEn-N node? In terms of the SoCal network, what would be our preferred location and configuration? What kind of installation makes the most sense in terms of our service to the local valley, my own problem notwithstanding? Does the club have old (or new) radios and TNCs sitting around that could be put into this service? [We probably do.] If it's just a matter of making a cable or loading some software or something, I'd be happy to work on it. If it means installing something new on Cerro Negro, that's probably a broader effort.[We have limited access to the repeater site on Cerro Negro, and limited room once you get there] Courtney OK all you APRS gurus.... what's the best solution for Courtney's problem... directional antennas? Beaconing every 0.5 seconds? Microwave transmission of power to Courtney as he bikes through the hills (keeps him warm AND connected simultaneously)? http://www.findu.com/cgi-bin/find.cgi?call=n5bf-3&terra=4 http://www.findu.com/cgi-bin/find.cgi?call=n5bf-4&terra=4 Jim, W6RMK
- Previous message: [aprssig] Minnesota digi updates.
- Next message: [aprssig] Question about low power APRS in Los Angeles area
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
