[aprssig] RE: N1547C tracker
David Dobbins ddobbins at direcway.comThu Oct 20 12:44:55 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] RE: N1547C tracker
- Next message: [aprssig] D700 as a digi
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Eric, info the group: I agree Eric that we're all responsible to patrol the RF spectrum. A D700 is not necessarily the best tool to do so, and a check of findu.com to confirm any suspicions, or further check of your home station computer if you have one (you probably do) would have easily confirmed the status text including my callsign. On top of that, it's not even necessary to transmit the status text on the same output path as the position reports. Ergo, any tracker could use a position path of WIDE7-7, and no path on the status text, meaning it goes out but does not get digipeated as far as the position report (which would include the tactical call only). The rules are satisfied as they call for a transmission of the info, not necessarily the receipt of that info by someone monitoring the frequency. So it is not a fair assumption that the tracker is out of whack just because you don't receive the data. That used to bother me, but not as much anymore as I know our people are responsible enough, and we ask them to set up a similar path for both status text and position info. You just need to be cautious and do your homework for some sort of confirmation of your suspicions before "complaining" on a huge list like the aprssig. I've been playing this game with trackers and APRS since 1993 when is was APRSdos and nothing else. I'm still learning, but have a pretty good base of knowledge built up. The comment you quoted does not say I'm not interested in watching too. It was my tracker, my postings to the sigs, my time spent getting pictures and text for the web page, and my personal email exchanges with several people along the way who reported watching with interest. That should be the obvious "I'm interested" comment I previously posted. Dave K7GPS -----Original Message----- From: Christensen, Eric [mailto:CHRISTENSENE at MAIL.ECU.EDU] Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 4:43 AM To: David Dobbins Cc: aprssig at lists.tapr.org Subject: RE: N1547C tracker My assumptions, sir, came directly from your website. "I am installing a tracker for friends and family to keep up with their progress, using their N number as the tracker callsign." That sounds an awful lot like you installing a tracker for a non-ham so other non-hams can keep up with him. AND, I watched well over fifteen minutes position reports come across my D700 without seeing a callsign. Maybe I didn't get the ones that did have a callsign or maybe the callsign wasn't showing up on the D700. As my original e-mail stated, I was mobile and couldn't look at the packets and wanted someone to take a look at them for me. It is every ham's job to patrol the RF spectrum to protect it from commercial ventures or we might just loose our spectrum. And, no, I don't have a problem with tactical callsigns. Eric KF4OTN _____ From: David Dobbins Sent: Thu 20-Oct-05 00:15 To: Christensen, Eric Cc: aprssig at lists.tapr.org Subject: N1547C tracker I'm watching every inch of the N1547C travels on both findu.com and APRS. The tracker was not installed for the express use of the pilot's family/friends. What a ridiculous assumption, as was the oversight of not watching for a couple of minutes and seeing the status text which properly included my call when using a non-ham tactical callsign for the tracker. While I doubt the Delaney's will run out and get their ham licenses, I've already heard from Tim that his nephew in California has been watching too, is taking a ham class right now, and is sharing the excitement of watching his Uncle and Aunt fly around the country. The flight will be completed in early Nov, when the Delaney's return to Santa Rosa (not Santa Clara), CA. Then they'll send the tracker back and I'll get it ready for one of our local marathon's and continue using tactical callsigns. It seems some people have issue with the tactical callsign being the same as the N number of their airplane. I don't see the issue here, and believe me, this tracker is operating well within FCC part 97. I also have contact with Tim while he's flying, or on the ground, via cell phone, so if the tracker suddenly locks up or goes awry, I just give him a call. The cell phone is wired into his headset, along with aircraft radio and XM satellite. I just talked with Tim today, and it looks like they may have to detour some because of Hurricane Wilma. In advance of their trip, I posted a message to both the nwaprssig and aprssig mailing lists. I included all the data that is also posted on the http://nwaprs.info/n1547cexpedition.htm web page. If you still have a gripe about the tracker, then send it to me. My email addresses are posted all over the place, or you can try k7gps at arrl.net as I've reactivated that one again to see if the spam and porno offers are finally gone, as ARRL has promised. I guess I'm more surprised at the bitching going on rather than people watching some cutting edge use of APRS that keeps things interesting here. When the fellow flew around the country last year in his plane, the tracker loaned him used a ham club call that had no connection to the pilot, and the pilot was not a ham either. He turned the D7A and GPS on and off manually. My tracker in N1547C is wired to the ignition. So I guess the issue is the use of a tactical callsign, which is really a non-issue, because tactical callsigns are used/have been used everywhere APRS can be found. Need I ramble on further, or can we return this threads to more positive comments? Dave K7GPS -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20051020/bac14175/attachment.htm
- Previous message: [aprssig] RE: N1547C tracker
- Next message: [aprssig] D700 as a digi
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
