[aprssig] N1547C tracker

[Steve Dimse]

On Oct 20, 2005, at 5:21 PM, John K9IJ wrote:

> Along with that, the only reason that APRS has been 'allowed' to  
> continue
> is that it has not been 'officially' brought to the attention of  
> the FCC. If that happens,
> it's entirely likely that APRS will be declared not legal and we  
> all will suffer.
>
We disagree completely on our interpretation of the rules. It is my  
belief that APRS is completely legal, that unattended trackers are  
completely legal, and I believe that if the FCC were to issue a  
ruling it would be in APRS' favor. If you believe APRS is illegal,  
why are you participating?

It seems mighty strange to be arguing that trackers should not be  
used so the FCC won't notice how illegal APRS is!

Steve K4HG