[aprssig] N1547C tracker

[John K9IJ]

At 04:30 PM 10/20/2005, you wrote:

>On Oct 20, 2005, at 5:21 PM, John K9IJ wrote:
>
>>Along with that, the only reason that APRS has been 'allowed' to
>>continue
>>is that it has not been 'officially' brought to the attention of
>>the FCC. If that happens,
>>it's entirely likely that APRS will be declared not legal and we
>>all will suffer.
>We disagree completely on our interpretation of the rules. It is my
>belief that APRS is completely legal, that unattended trackers are
>completely legal, and I believe that if the FCC were to issue a
>ruling it would be in APRS' favor. If you believe APRS is illegal,
>why are you participating?
>
>It seems mighty strange to be arguing that trackers should not be
>used so the FCC won't notice how illegal APRS is!

Well... MY operation, of MY tracker is completely within the rules.



-

John Rice  K9IJ
k9ij at vx5.com
Webmaster, Network Admin, Janitor
http://www.k9ij.com
http://www.suhfars.org
http://www.vx5.com/~teampf