Order Tray | Contact Us | Home | SIG Lists

[aprssig] N1547C tracker

John K9IJ k9ij at vx5.com
Thu Oct 20 21:35:22 UTC 2005

At 04:30 PM 10/20/2005, you wrote:

>On Oct 20, 2005, at 5:21 PM, John K9IJ wrote:
>>Along with that, the only reason that APRS has been 'allowed' to
>>is that it has not been 'officially' brought to the attention of
>>the FCC. If that happens,
>>it's entirely likely that APRS will be declared not legal and we
>>all will suffer.
>We disagree completely on our interpretation of the rules. It is my
>belief that APRS is completely legal, that unattended trackers are
>completely legal, and I believe that if the FCC were to issue a
>ruling it would be in APRS' favor. If you believe APRS is illegal,
>why are you participating?
>It seems mighty strange to be arguing that trackers should not be
>used so the FCC won't notice how illegal APRS is!

Well... MY operation, of MY tracker is completely within the rules.


John Rice  K9IJ
k9ij at vx5.com
Webmaster, Network Admin, Janitor

More information about the aprssig mailing list