[aprssig] APRS in Disaster area
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduFri Sep 2 22:39:24 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] Suggested replacement TNC for WIDE digi
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS in Disaster area
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>> Yes, of course, if they know how to, or have >> better ideas about re-establishing the APRS >> network, then of course folllow their lead. >> But in most areas, only 2% of the HAM >> population knows anything about APRS and >> has no clue how to "instruct" its re-constitution. > >You missed the point, Bob. In an emergency >situation, it is the AUTHORITIES in charge, NOT >the individual operators who decide what type >of communications are to be used and how those >communications are to be used. Actually, I think we agree on all of this. It was the ham radio "authorities", then, that I was offering the recommendations to about how to best re-establish an APRS infrastructure. As noted above, only 2% of HAM radio operators (including many of the "authorities" have no experience with APRS. My offering was to educate who-ever is in the "authoritative" position to make it happen, on ideas on how to reconstruct an ad-hoc APRS network. Did not intend for it to be implying ham radio anarchy which seems to be how it is being intepreted by some... Bob
- Previous message: [aprssig] Suggested replacement TNC for WIDE digi
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS in Disaster area
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
