[aprssig] APRS Voice Alert

[Charles Doughtie]

I am a bit puzzled at people telling Bob, of all
people, that Voice Alert is a bad idea. Working
for the postal service, I remember United Parcel
Service trying to tell the USPS that 78710 was 
not a valid ZIP (developed circa 1963) code. 
Go figure.

de Charlie, N5EXY, Mid'n '61
South Suburban Greater Hutto, Texas

--- AE5PL Lists <HamLists at ametx.com> wrote:

> Bob,
> 
> Where do you get 85%?  I just ran some queries on
> stations heard over
> the last 30 days:
> 
> Mic-E stations: 7241
> TH-D7s: 602
> TM-D700s: 3596
> Total non-Mic-E stations (many trackers, HamHuds,
> etc. do not use Mic-E
> and must guestimated from this number): 18757
> 
> I don't see 85% jump out at me from those numbers.
> 
> 73,
> 
> Pete Loveall AE5PL
> mailto:pete at ae5pl.net 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robert Bruninga
> > Posted At: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 9:13 AM
> > Subject: RE: [aprssig] APRS Voice Alert
> > 
> > Depends on what "most" means....
> > 
> > It is a fact that 85% of all APRS mobiles that
> receive APRS 
> > while mobile are using
> > D7 or D700's.  And since Voice Alert is
> > primarily only used on these radios,
> > This just isnt that big a deal.  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at lists.tapr.org
>
https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
> 



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com