[aprssig] Using RELAY or WIDE1-1 in a path
William McKeehan mckeehan at mckeehan.homeip.netSat Sep 10 23:51:06 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] Using RELAY or WIDE1-1 in a path
- Next message: [aprssig] Using RELAY or WIDE1-1 in a path
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Maybe I'm overlooking it, but I do not see any reference to not using WIDE1-1 in any position beyond the first under the new paradigm in the referenced document. If I'm missing it, please point it out to me. On Sat, September 10, 2005 7:34 pm, Mark White said: > On Sat, 09/10/2005, 07:17PM, William McKeehan wrote: >> Is there any "official" web site that explains why it is a bad idea to use >> RELAY or WIDE1-1 in the path (except in the first position)? I have a few >> users in my area that are doing it and I want to explain it to them, but >> would >> like to have some "official" backup. >> > > That's a question that will be the cause of Flame War III... > > http://web.usna.navy.mil/~bruninga/aprs/fix14439.html > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > -- William McKeehan KI4HDU Internet: mckeehan at mckeehan.homeip.net http://mckeehan.homeip.net
- Previous message: [aprssig] Using RELAY or WIDE1-1 in a path
- Next message: [aprssig] Using RELAY or WIDE1-1 in a path
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
