[aprssig] Using RELAY or WIDE1-1 in a path
mckeehan at mckeehan.homeip.net
Sat Sep 10 19:37:23 CDT 2005
Perfect! Thanks for point it out to me!
On Sat, September 10, 2005 8:34 pm, Cap Pennell said:
> A link from there leads to
> Where it's stated (in part):
> "WARNING: However, like anything, the setting can be abused. Just like
> RELAY, users should never use WIDE1-1 anywhere except the first hop in a
> Just like RELAY was never used beyond the first hop, because it keys up all
> of the fill-in-digis at once."
> The "wars" have been fought and ended some time back, and now it's clearly
> time for us to all implement the new paradigm for the benefit of all the
> 73, Cap KE6AFE
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org
>> [mailto:aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org]On Behalf Of William McKeehan
>> Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 16:51 PM
>> To: TAPR APRS Mailing List
>> Subject: Re: [aprssig] Using RELAY or WIDE1-1 in a path
>> Maybe I'm overlooking it, but I do not see any reference to not
>> using WIDE1-1
>> in any position beyond the first under the new paradigm in the referenced
>> If I'm missing it, please point it out to me.
>> On Sat, September 10, 2005 7:34 pm, Mark White said:
>> > On Sat, 09/10/2005, 07:17PM, William McKeehan wrote:
>> >> Is there any "official" web site that explains why it is a bad
>> idea to use
>> >> RELAY or WIDE1-1 in the path (except in the first position)? I
>> have a few
>> >> users in my area that are doing it and I want to explain it to
>> them, but
>> >> would
>> >> like to have some "official" backup.
>> > That's a question that will be the cause of Flame War III...
>> > http://web.usna.navy.mil/~bruninga/aprs/fix14439.html
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at lists.tapr.org
Internet: mckeehan at mckeehan.homeip.net
More information about the aprssig