[aprssig] How should this work -> TRACE WIDE2-2
Andre PE1RDW aprs at pe1rdw.demon.nlWed Sep 14 14:31:50 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] How should this work -> TRACE WIDE2-2
- Next message: [aprssig] How should this work -> TRACE WIDE2-2
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andre PE1RDW schreef: > VE7GDH schreef: > >> Maiko VE4KLM wrote on Sept 13 2005 >> >>> Let's say that my system recognizes WIDE2-2, but not >>> the TRACE digi call. >>> >>> A station on RF sends a MIC-E frame as follows : >>> >>> STATION > UXXXXX via TRACE via WIDE2-2 >>> >>> question 1: should my system digi this as a WIDE2-1, or >>> should my system ignore this (since TRACE is the immediate >>> destination call, not WIDE2-2) ? >> >> >> >> Stephen's answer is correct. However, if you are going to buy into >> the "new >> paradigm", you should realize that RELAY, WIDE, TRACE and TRACEn-n >> are obsolete (at least in North America) and shouldn't be used... >> i.e. you >> should not be supporting TRACE. However, from your comment, it sound >> like you may already be not supporting it. >> > <snip> > >> See http://web.usna.navy.mil/~bruninga/aprs/fix14439.html for an >> explanation >> of the "new paradigm" settings. If you are using a KPC-3+ for your >> digi (doesn't look like you are), see www.nwaprs.info (the old URL >> was www.nwaprs.org) for a site that gives a really clear explanation >> of the suggested settings. There are links to both the "fix 144.390" >> and NWAPRS sites in the "APRS Links" section at the bottom of the >> main page on the UI-View32 site at www.ui-view.org. >> > Knowing Maiko he wants to incorperate aprs digipeating into jnos, it > would make sence as there is already an igate module in jnos written > by him. > > In that case my sugestion would be to make it flexable. > It could be rule driven like digi_ned > http://www.qsl.net/digi_ned/ > or a definable uiflood and uitrace call like: > set uiflood ss (new n-n) or set uiflood wide (existing n-n) > set uitrace wide (new n-n) or set uitrace trace (existing n-n) > set uihop 2 (new n-n) or set uihop 7 (existing n-n) > > A very clear discription on how aprs path should behave is given in > the path.txt file from the aprs dos package > in short the uiflood alias decreases the number of the ssid everytime > it is digipeated on and only the first (when the ssid matches the > number after the alias) will have the call inserted. > uitrace always has the call inserted. > uihop would limit the number of hops it would act on, so with uihop > set to 2 it will only act for wide2-2 and not wide3-3 or alternativly > change wide3-3 to wide2-2 before acting on it. > One addition to come back to the original question, pre-emptive digipeating where you ignore the unsuported aliases and jump right to the suported alias is a very usefull function, it can sometimes give unexpected results but I think it is worth it to include the option, operators can always decide to include it or not. 73 de Andre PE1RDW
- Previous message: [aprssig] How should this work -> TRACE WIDE2-2
- Next message: [aprssig] How should this work -> TRACE WIDE2-2
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
