[aprssig] How should this work -> TRACE WIDE2-2
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduWed Sep 14 14:56:14 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] How should this work -> TRACE WIDE2-2
- Next message: [aprssig] How should this work -> TRACE WIDE2-2
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> set uiflood ss (new n-n) or set uiflood wide (existing n-n) > set uitrace wide (new n-n) or set uitrace trace (existing n-n) > set uihop 2 (new n-n) or set uihop 7 (existing n-n) Or uihop 3 (new n-n) in areas that can afford it. I would say, that looking at the APRS density map on http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/aprs/usamapfu.gif there is no need to restrict hops to WIDE2-2 in 70% of north america. Taking mountains -and-density into consideration I/d think that a map something like this would work as a ballpark recommendation? http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/aprs/usamapfuAreas.gif I know I will get flack, beacuse this is an area of local interest and details, but nature abhors a vacuum, so if there must be a chart, could this be it? de WB4APR, Bob
- Previous message: [aprssig] How should this work -> TRACE WIDE2-2
- Next message: [aprssig] How should this work -> TRACE WIDE2-2
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
