[aprssig] Bad path for a plane
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduMon Apr 10 22:03:01 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] Bad path for a plane
- Next message: [aprssig] Bad path for a plane
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
That packet would have been trapped at the source if the first digi was simply a New-N digi. We still have hundreds of digis out there that have not done the simple New-N changes to their parameters... Bob >>> Ron Stordahl <ron.stordahl at digikey.com> 04/10/06 4:59 PM >>> The 'law' will have to be enforced by smarter digipeaters, which scan the path and discards the packets which violate the rules. With the installed base of KPC3's and UIDIGI-ROM's that's going to be a long long time.... Ron, N5IN James Washer wrote: > there ought to be a law against that one > > On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 15:14:07 -0500 > "John Habbinga" <kc5zrq at gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Bad paths are all the rage these days. I picked up a trucker in Lubbock >> that was in Louisianna. No special propagation. >> >> http://www.findu.com/cgi-bin/find.cgi?call=k5rok-14 >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > _______________________________________________ aprssig mailing list aprssig at lists.tapr.org https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
- Previous message: [aprssig] Bad path for a plane
- Next message: [aprssig] Bad path for a plane
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
