[aprssig] Bad path for a plane
Matt Werner kb0kqa at gmail.comMon Apr 10 22:38:12 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] Bad path for a plane
- Next message: [aprssig] Bad path for a plane
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Will the KPC3 trap "WIDE1-1, WIDE2-2, WIDE2-2, WIDE2-2"? What about "WIDE2-2, WIDE1-1"? On 4/10/06, Doug Ferrell <kd4moj at kd4moj.org> wrote: > > >>> Ron Stordahl <ron.stordahl at digikey.com> 04/10/06 4:59 PM >>> > > The 'law' will have to be enforced by smarter digipeaters, which scan > > the path and discards the packets which violate the rules. With the > > installed base of KPC3's and UIDIGI-ROM's that's going to be a long long > > time.... > > > HHmmmmm the KPC-3's on the new paradigm catches the bad paths and > stops 'em dead (just like Raid). I agree that there are many solutions to > the problem but I'm curious about the above statement 'With the installed > based of KPC3's and UIDI-ROMS's...' > > As the operator of 3 WIDE digi's, I've seen firsthand "bad packets > (i.e relay,wide3-3,wide3-3) that get's stopped dead. now that more local > digi-ops (tri-state area, GA AL,FL) have adopted the new paradigm, i've > seen at least an 80% drop of trash packets coming through. > > -- > ...DOUG > KD4MOJ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig >
- Previous message: [aprssig] Bad path for a plane
- Next message: [aprssig] Bad path for a plane
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
