[aprssig] Bad path for a plane
Herb Gerhardt hgerhardt at wavecable.comTue Apr 11 00:11:49 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] Bad path for a plane
- Next message: [aprssig] Bad path for a plane
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Under the new Paradigm Settings adopted last year, the answer is NO to both paths listed. It is hoped that people use a little common sense and follow the new Paradigm Settings. See our web page for the way we do it here on our NW APRS Network. Herb, KB7UVC NW APRS Group, West Sound Coordinator Our WEB Site: http://www.nwaprs.info > -----Original Message----- > From: aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org > [mailto:aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org]On Behalf Of Matt Werner > Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 3:38 PM > To: TAPR APRS Mailing List > Subject: Re: [aprssig] Bad path for a plane > > > Will the KPC3 trap "WIDE1-1, WIDE2-2, WIDE2-2, WIDE2-2"? > > What about "WIDE2-2, WIDE1-1"? > >
- Previous message: [aprssig] Bad path for a plane
- Next message: [aprssig] Bad path for a plane
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
