[aprssig] TNC vs AGWPE
scott at opentrac.org scott at opentrac.orgTue Apr 18 16:13:31 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] TNC vs AGWPE
- Next message: [aprssig] TNC vs AGWPE
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Speaking of the wiki, is there anything there yet on PHGR? Someone on the OpenTracker list brought up the fact that it's hard to find proper documentation. A link to an online calculator would be good, too. Scott N1VG > -----Original Message----- > From: aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org > [mailto:aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org] On Behalf Of Chris Howard > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 9:07 AM > To: TAPR APRS Mailing List > Subject: Re: [aprssig] TNC vs AGWPE > > I think this post would be a very good addition to the aprs wiki! > Steve, if you don't mind, can I put it up there? > Or if you would do it, even better. > > We've got a page about agwpe that needs filled out > and another about soundcard as tnc. > > Chris > w0ep > > > > On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 09:42, Stephen H. Smith wrote: > > kc5zrq at gmail.com wrote: > > > Don't use the "9600" out. As far as I know, the ISS uses > 1200 baud. > > > > > > > 1) The so-called "9600 out" is not a data output. It's > actually > > non-squelched non-de-emhasized AUDIO out, directly from > the receiver's > > FM discriminator. (This is the kind of audio connection > you MUST HAVE > > for connecting external TNCs running at 9600 baud, although > it is also > > usable for TNCs running at 1200.) > > > > The "9600" output is usually about 50millivolts which will > overload the > > typical PC "mic input" and cause severe distortion unless > you use about > > a 5:1 or 10:1 attenuator pad. > > > > Further, many PC mic input jacks have 3-5 volts DC on them to power > > active electret external mics. The proper way to couple > the radio's > > audio into the PC is to first use a 1:1 turns ratio audio > transformer in > > order to avoid a common ground between the radio and the > computer. (The > > typical 600:600 ohm transformer used in telephone devices > like modems, > > answering machines, etc. is ideal). The secondary side of the > > transformer should be connected across a voltage divider > network of two > > resistors in series. The one closer to ground should be > around 1K while > > the upper one typically will be somewhere between 4.7K and 10K. > > Finally connect the center point of the two resistors, to > the PC audio > > input using something like a .1 to .5 uF series capacitor > to block any > > DC that may be present on the mic input. > > > > Note that the PC mic input is SINGLE CHANNEL even though it uses a > > stereo TIP-RING-SLEEVE (3-conductor) mini-plug. Normally the TIP > > carries +5 VDC power WHILE the ring carries AUDIO. The > ring may or may > > not also have 3-5 VDC on it for use with mics that carry DC > and audio on > > the same conductor. > > > > > > > > > > 2) Once you have your audio network in place, click the > AGW icon in > > the system tray and choose "Soundcard Tuning Aid". One the > resulting > > screen, click the radio button for " Oscilloscope Sine > Wave". Watch > > the display as packet bursts come in. You should see a > clean sinewave > > display here. Use the Windows RECORD mixer (not the > default PLAYBACK > > mixer that you get initially when you click the speaker icon in the > > tray) to adjust the audio level for a clean sine wave. > Note that you > > will see white-noise random grass between bursts since this is > > non-squelched audio. It's perfectly normal for this noise > to clip on > > peaks. The goal is that the sine wave DURING packet > bursts be smooth > > and rounded with no flat topping. > > > > Note that the options in the Windows mixer for the mic > input channel on > > many sound cards includes a checkbox for a "+20 dB Mic > Booster". This is > > for the benefit of low-output non-amplified mics (i.e. > passive dynamic > > mics) instead of electret ones. You definitely want this > box UNCHECKED. > > > > > > > > > > 3) Most modern PCs, both laptop and desktop no longer > have dedicated > > sound card hardware in them. The built-in "AC97 Compatible" sound > > systems are basically an A-D converter and nothing else. > The "heavy > > lifting" precisely-timed sampling and processing of sound > that was > > traditionally done by a dedicated processor, RAM and > accurate clock on > > the sound card is now done by the main CPU of the computer. > > > > > > The CPU clock usually isn't as accurate as the one on a > sound card. > > Further, the CPU is sharing it's available pool of clock > cycles between > > a varying number of other processes with varying interrupt response > > times (latencies). The result is that the sampling rate is > frequently > > far off of the desired 11,025 or 8,000 samples/sec that > ham soundcard > > apps expect. Further IT VARIES depending on how many > other programs > > are running at the same time! There are several > utilities that will > > measure the actual sampling rate of the sound card. > > > > > > Unfortunately, unlike some ham sound card programs such as > mmSSTV and > > MixW, AGW has no provision for entering corrections for the > sampling > > rate errors. If the sample rate is severely off, your > only recourse > > is to try a different sound card -- in the case of a > laptop this will > > mean either a PCMCIA -card based sound system, or an external > > USB-connected one. > > > > > > Ironically, the older Pentium I and Pentium II laptops > often had far > > superior sound systems based on dedicated Soundblaster, > ESS, or Crystal > > Audio chip sets just like add-on PCI-card sound systems in > desk top > > PCs. Today's hotrod P4 or Centrino laptops usually have the > > far-inferior "brain-dead" host-based AC97 sound systems. But AC97 > > systems reduce parts count, power consumption and are CHEAP > CHEAP. I > > have a couple of 10-year-old Dell 3000 Pentium I 200MHz > MMX - based > > laptops that I keep around exclusively for ham soundcard > operating with > > mmSSTV, AGW, MixW and Echolink precisely because their > sound systems are > > superior to my newer machines. Further these "classic" > machines have > > the audio LINE input in addition to the MIC input which is > far superior > > for ham sound card applications. With AGW, the true stereo line > > input actually allows you to create a DUAL-PORT tnc similar to a > > Kantronics KAM or 9624, with one radio connected to the > left channel and > > a second radio on the right channel. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stephen H. Smith wa8lmf (at) aol.com > > EchoLink Node: 14400 [Think bottom of the 2M band] > > Home Page: http://wa8lmf.com > > > > > > NEW! JavAPRS Filter Port 14580 Guide > > http://webs.lanset.com/wa8lmf/aprs/JAVaprsFilters.htm > > > > UI-View Misc Notes and FAQ > > http://webs.lanset.com/wa8lmf/aprs/UIview_Notes.htm > > > > "APRS 101" Explanation of APRS Path Selection & Digipeating > > http://webs.lanset.com/wa8lmf/DigiPaths > > > > Updated "Rev G" APRS http://webs.lanset.com/wa8lmf/aprs > > Symbols Set for UI-View, > > UIpoint and APRSplus: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > aprssig mailing list > > aprssig at lists.tapr.org > > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > >
- Previous message: [aprssig] TNC vs AGWPE
- Next message: [aprssig] TNC vs AGWPE
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
