[aprssig] New-N Paradigm Progress
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduSat Feb 11 03:21:17 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] Tethering to Cell Phone
- Next message: [aprssig] New-N Paradigm Progress
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tonight I loaded up APRSdos to look at the network and the 'users' appear to be making good progress in the WashDC/ Baltimore area (though the digi sysops do not).... Of all packets on RF: 55% are using WIDE2-2 18% are using WIDE1-1 (most included in the 55% too) 13% are using WIDE3-3 16% are still using WIDE (mostly digis!) 1% are using RELAY (good news) 10% are IGate packets. Of 50 digi's in the area, at least 14 are not upgraded to New-N and are generating the most QRM with their WIDE,WIDE... packets. My ALOHA circle is 39 miles and contains 54 users, 13 digis, 12 mobiles and 4 WX but that covers all of WashDC and Baltimore areas and the state capital in Annapolis. Just about right. Other anomolies noted: At least 8 stations have their unproto messed up with the path in the TOCALL field making them not appear on my map. They may be UIview stations that have entered their UNPROTO path incorrectly... The highest packet couint is a APT tracker transmitting both a position and a separate status every minute. Why doest he put the status in the position text? Then there is an X-DIGI that is not transmititing an identifying TOCALL. I woiuld have thought that the X-DIGI would have had that built in so that owners cant screw it up? Just some observations. Bob
- Previous message: [aprssig] Tethering to Cell Phone
- Next message: [aprssig] New-N Paradigm Progress
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
