[aprssig] Definitive digipeater specification?
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduMon Feb 27 22:45:42 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] Definitive digipeater specification?
- Next message: [aprssig] Definitive digipeater specification?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>> ad6nh at arrl.net 02/27/06 5:24 PM >>> >A few of us are experimenting with AX.25 digipeating, >using NSR... we are proposing to use the "A" >overlay on these digis Actually, we are using the "A" overlay for all ALT-INPUT digis that had the +600 alternate input on 144.99. Maybe you could use the X overlay for aX25? And you know I am opposed to NSR routing unless it allows DIGI1,DIGI2,DIGIn... routing. Remember, the 3 hop path above gets a packet from point A to the desired Point B with only 3 copies And is the most efficient on-freq method possible. This is FAR LESS load on the network than even a WIDE2-2 packet which can generate 16 copies in some areas. There just is no on-freq digipeating method more efficient for getting a packet from A to B then the directed path. Unless you go to tunneling, gateways, backbones and level 4 and of course, then it is not "digipeating" and therefore not part of the argument. My position is that only the ORIGINATOR of a packet knows where HE needs to communicate at any particular instance. NSR is an attempt to give SYSOPS total control and force all users into a one-size fits all definition of what APRS and the users are (tracking for example)... And that just kills the flexibility of the system to respond to what a USER may need at any given instant. In otherwords, NSR is a solution for the flooding problem we used to have but so is New-N, and New-N has significanly solved that problem everywhere it is used. But New-N does not prohibit the very efficient point-to-point intellligent use of the network when needed. And New-N does not need re-configuration and detailed SYSOP management at all digis each time a new digi comes or goes. Good luck.... keep me posted on what you learn and anything that we can learn from the experiment. Bob, WB4APR Robert Bruninga wrote: >Scott, >use my New-N Paradigm as the "official" digipeating >guide for APRS these days. >http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/aprs/fix14439.html > >Bob, WB4APR > > > >>>>scott at opentrac.org 02/27/06 4:17 PM >>> >>>> >>>> >Is there any 'official' explanation of exactly how a modern APRS digipeater is supposed to function? The AX.25 spec just covers the conventional digipeating. I think I have a pretty good handle on it, but I know there's been some inconsistency out there. Just want to make sure I'm working from the best source material available. > >A flow chart or state diagram would be great... > >Scott >N1VG > > >_______________________________________________ >aprssig mailing list >aprssig at lists.tapr.org >https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > > >_______________________________________________ >aprssig mailing list >aprssig at lists.tapr.org >https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > > > > _______________________________________________ aprssig mailing list aprssig at lists.tapr.org https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
- Previous message: [aprssig] Definitive digipeater specification?
- Next message: [aprssig] Definitive digipeater specification?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
