[aprssig] The best resolution of position from APRS
J. Lance Cotton joe at lightningflash.netTue Jan 3 13:35:01 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] The best resolution of position from APRS
- Next message: [aprssig] The best resolution of position from APRS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrew Rich wrote: > Which begs me to ask. What is the best resolution and how from the APRS > Spec ? The best resolution is to use compressed mode. Unfortunately, several months ago, Bob said that no one should use it at all, lest the be tempted to use it on an Object or Item which wouldn't be decoded by the Kenwoods. If we all used compressed position packets (on all but items and objects), all of our packets would be so much shorter and the 144.39 channel could support more users (or rather could better support the existing ones!) And we'd get the advantage of increased numerical precision, if not accuracy (depends on the GPS). -Lance -- J. Lance Cotton, KJ5O joe at lightningflash.net http://kj5o.lightningflash.net Three Step Plan: 1. Take over the world. 2. Get a lot of cookies. 3. Eat the cookies.
- Previous message: [aprssig] The best resolution of position from APRS
- Next message: [aprssig] The best resolution of position from APRS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
