[aprssig] The best resolution of position from APRS
Curt, WE7U archer at eskimo.comTue Jan 3 17:28:07 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] The best resolution of position from APRS
- Next message: [aprssig] The best resolution of position from APRS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Robert Bruninga wrote: > >>> w9jbl at comcast.net 01/03/06 10:33 AM >>> > >This begs the question of how many APRS users > >have an APRS-capable Kenwood radio? > >I personally know of only one ham who has a KW D-700. > > Around here, just about everyone that is into APRS > for other than as a cute WEB application, has a D7 > or D700. Looking globally, at data from FINDU, a > year or so ago, 85% of everyone who receives APRS > while mobile uses a D7 or D700. The key words above are "receives" and "while mobile". They assume one particular method of operation. Why do mapping applications get called "cute WEB applications"? "Cute" implies less useful, and what's "WEB" got to do with it? Most if not all of the apps are capable of being used with local maps and often are. Check the APRS Client Capabilities Chart for details. Other methods of operation are useful also: Many people run transmit-only trackers, great for SAR and public-service events. Often in this case only a small number of stations are needed to keep track of multiple rovers. A desktop application is used at base and voice to/from the rovers (if needed) is often carried out on another frequency, often a commercial frequency like we use for SAR. Sure, receiving/mapping/2-way messaging can generally make each station more useful, but it's often unnecessary and comes at a price, whether it's $$, space, size, weight, ruggedness, power usage, whatever. I maintain the capability to add a full mapping/2-way messaging station to my mobile when required (truck-mount Linux box running Xastir plus a TNC-X TNC). Most of the time the extra capability would go unused so I run an OpenTracker transmit-only unit instead. I don't need/use dual-band radios, plus I require more from a TNC than what the Kenwoods are capable of (talking about non-APRS operation here). This makes the Kenwoods overpriced for my needs, even when you consider that I run two separate 2-meter mobiles so that I can have QSO's and do APRS at the same time. If the built-in TNC's were more full-featured, including support for multiple long frames in KISS mode, I might weigh things a bit differently and buy some. My ideal unit would be a fully capable KISS/APRS tracker TNC in a single-band radio, with SmartBeaconing(tm) included. Oh yea, throw in Base-91 compression too so I can get the higher resolution but in the short packets. I'm looking forward to Scott's up-and-coming TNC to replace my OpenTracker. This will give mapping on my GPS map display plus the option to throw the Linux box into the Jeep without having to replace the TNC as I do now (as long a full-blown KISS mode is supported). Less fuss for me that way and I can leave the TNC-X on the home APRS station. Alinco built-in TNC's are much in the same category as the Kenwood TNC's (limited use outside APRS), but the latest Alinco's digipeat and have APRS flooding protocols like the D700A (which the Kenwood D7A TNC lacks but the D700A includes). The Alinco DR-135TP (older 2-meter only radio with built-in TNC) can't digipeat and is therefore of course missing the APRS flooding protocols too. People who don't need TCP/IP capability but need a dual-band APRS radio seem to prefer the Kenwoods. FWIW my mobile APRS radio is a Kenwood too, but it's a single-band 2-meter mobile with no built-in TNC. It's cost effective for me: $130 for the radio, $30 for the GPS, $30 for the OpenTracker kit, and a bit of wiring/assembly for a 50W capable mobile. I usually run it at the mid-power setting. Add another $130 for another mobile 2-meter and of course I'm running 2 antennas (but I already had them). Add another $50 for a TNC-X kit for when I need full-blown mapping and/or TCP/IP communications. I can then throw in a PDA, laptop, or truck-mount PC for the full deal. -- Curt, WE7U. APRS Client Comparisons: http://www.eskimo.com/~archer "Lotto: A tax on people who are bad at math." -- unknown "Windows: Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates." -- WE7U "The world DOES revolve around me: I picked the coordinate system!"
- Previous message: [aprssig] The best resolution of position from APRS
- Next message: [aprssig] The best resolution of position from APRS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
