[aprssig] The best resolution of position from APRS
bruninga at usna.edu
Tue Jan 3 16:06:58 CST 2006
>>> "Curt, WE7U" <archer at eskimo.com> 01/03/06 2:08 PM >>>
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Robert Bruninga wrote:
>> Please, do not encourage the use of the
>> obsolete, broken, compressed object format.
>You yourself asked me at one time to encourage
>the use of Base-91 compressed packets.
That was 8 years ago. Then 7 years ago, we found
out it that compressed OBJECTS were not used at
the time AND incompatible with the Kenwoods. Since
then, for the last 6 years I have asked for everyone
to not use the compressed object format and it
was obsoleted in the APRS11 adendum.
>The Kenwood ratios _do_ decode Base-91
>compressed posits. What they_don't_ decode is
>base-91 compressed object/item format. Why
>obsolete the entire format just because the
>Kenwoods didn't implement that part of it?
Pleaser read my line 1 again. I said the compressed
OBJECT Format is obsolete, I did not say the
compressed position format is obsolete.
Curt, WE7U. APRS Client Comparisons: http://www.eskimo.com/~archer
"Lotto: A tax on people who are bad at math." -- unknown
"Windows: Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates." -- WE7U
"The world DOES revolve around me: I picked the coordinate system!"
More information about the aprssig