[aprssig] Re: The best resolution of position from APRS
Curt Mills archer at eskimo.comWed Jan 4 07:11:12 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: The best resolution of position from APRS
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: WARNING If you are using Streets&Trips 2006 or
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, KC2MMi wrote: > I'm confused by your "new" position spec, I don't find any definitions of your > DD.MM.HH format. What are the H's for? And do you mean, a human has to manually > translate the DD.MM format and then manually add the other digits, which are in > feet, to the lat/lon displayed? It sounds like an inelegant kludge, if that is > being forced on the human operator in order to accomodate the Kenwood > limitations. (But, maybe I'm not at all understanding that right.) I'm sure it could be done by hand, but the general method would be to code that format into the APRS client itself so that the human operator didn't have to worry about it. Just turn on the "higher resolution" togglebutton and the packet gets formatted for transmit with the extra pieces on the end. Those clients that understood the extra pieces would show a higher resolution position, those that didn't would show the position as if the extra pieces weren't present. -- Curt, WE7U. archer at eskimo dot com http://www.eskimo.com/~archer Lotto: A tax on people who are bad at math. - unknown Windows: Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates. - WE7U. The world DOES revolve around me: I picked the coordinate system!"
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: The best resolution of position from APRS
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: WARNING If you are using Streets&Trips 2006 or
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
