[aprssig] Re: The best resolution of position from APRS
Curt, WE7U archer at eskimo.comWed Jan 4 16:24:06 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: The best resolution of position from APRS
- Next message: [aprssig] The best resolution of position from APRS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Robert Bruninga wrote: > What XASTIR wants to seem to do is keep using the > depricated obsolete compressed compressed object format > and complain for years because Kenwood wont make their > radios compatible with it. Thanks for speaking for our little group of 14 developers. I call BS on the statement above. Don't take this stuff so personal Bob. We're all trying to further the cause of this tracking stuff. > I wish they would just implemnet !DAO! and lets keep > everyone that currently exists compatible and get on with life.. I didn't say we _wouldn't_ implement the method you're talking about. A quick search through our Feature Request list didn't find it, but I'm sure it'll get implemented at some point. You might imagine it wouldn't have a high priority among the 223 open requests due to the fact that we already have a high-resolution method implemented plus have many other things on our plate we'd like to get to first. In my case I'd like to implement a bunch more SAR features. My frustration is due to the fact that years ago we all were striving to get as much of the spec implemented as possible and the future was looking bright for advancement of the art. Now we're delving into the cover-our-tracks (that's a funny) spec deprecation mode where we're taking giant leaps backwards, at the same time adding more kludges to an already kludged-up spec. You used to be one of the major proponents to getting the entire spec implemented. Somewhere along the line advancement of APRS itself was forgotten. You're suggesting programming for the lowest common denominator. I've seen other threads here which suggested that we not change anything that would break UI-View too much, because the author is SK and we'd alienate too many users. Again, programming for the lowest common denominator. Programming for the present state instead of looking to improve the future state of APRS. -- Curt, WE7U. APRS Client Comparisons: http://www.eskimo.com/~archer "Lotto: A tax on people who are bad at math." -- unknown "Windows: Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates." -- WE7U "The world DOES revolve around me: I picked the coordinate system!"
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: The best resolution of position from APRS
- Next message: [aprssig] The best resolution of position from APRS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
