[aprssig] 2-way tracker enclosure poll
Scott Miller scott at opentrac.orgWed Jan 4 20:36:38 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] Unsusbcribe rec.kenwood.aprs.usa.net
- Next message: [aprssig] The best resolution of position from APRS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This got kind of buried in the discussion, so I'll ask it again. I'm making good progress on my receive-capable OpenTracker. It plots all incoming positions, objects, and items as waypoints on a supported GPS receiver. It'll do generic NMEA output, and it will also support Garmin binary protocol for certain models. This allows the tracker to set the waypoint symbol, altitude, and comment text on supported GPS receivers. It'll also have some expanded telemetry capabilities, and will probably have the ability to control I/O outputs remotely. I'll probably have multiple hardware versions eventually, but for now I need to focus on whatever form factor is going to benefit the most people. Search and rescue use is one area I want to concentrate on, so it'd be nice to be able to offer a self-contained, battery-powered unit. That introduces some other problems, though. Here's a quick rundown of the options I'm looking at now: * Plastic case with inline DB9 connectors This would be the same as the new OT1x (http://n1vg.net/opentracker/images/ot1x.jpg), a Pac-Tec CNS-0101 with locking DB9 connectors. For a couple bucks more, it could be metallized for added RFI protection. Overall cost is low, and it'd take the same cables as current models. But it'd have no room for internal batteries, and the chief complaint with this layout is that it winds up being rather long with the connector shells inline. * Custom aluminum or steel enclosure Like the TNC-X, but probably shorter. Black powder-coated steel most likely, and probably with mounting flanges. Tough and durable, easy to mount for automotive applications, lots of room on the board for telemetry inputs and power connections. With a power control option, screw terminals, larger board, and so forth, maybe $15 or $20 more than the cheapest option (above). Could possibly have room for an internal 9-volt battery like the KPC-3, but wouldn't be easy to change. * Plastic case with single DB25 connector and 9-volt battery Probably the Serpac A-21 or similar. Reasonably compact, integrated 9-volt battery compartment. Fairly cheap since it's available with a DB25 panel and wouldn't require machining. Would require new cables to use the single connector, but would have plenty of pins for telemetry inputs and control outputs. * Plastic case with AA batteries Many cases that take a 9-volt battery can also take two AA size batteries. That gives you higher energy density, but requires a DC-DC converter to get the operating voltage, which adds cost and RFI/EMC issues. 6 or more batteries would provide plenty of power for the tracker and a GPS receiver, but would add bulk and weight. Haven't identified a candidate for this case style yet. I've got a poll running at http://n1vg.net/vote. Let me know what you think... I'm open to other options. At the moment, I think I'm leaning toward the steel enclosure. Not so convenient for man-portable operation, but the most flexible all around. And hopefully less headaches when it comes to PCB layout - the CNS-0101 size prototype was a major pain. Scott N1VG
- Previous message: [aprssig] Unsusbcribe rec.kenwood.aprs.usa.net
- Next message: [aprssig] The best resolution of position from APRS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
