[aprssig] The best resolution of ---
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduThu Jan 5 00:19:13 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] The best resolution of position from APRS
- Next message: [aprssig] The best resolution of ---
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>> wa7nwp at jnos.org 01/04/06 12:18 PM >>> >They have a name for a device that's not upgradeable. >It's called "disposable." >If the real world worked on that prinicple we'd all >still be watching Black and White TV. The Real World DOES WORK on that principle!!!! They introduced color by overlaying it on top of the Black and WHite signal that EVERY TV ever made can still receive. Not one TV set was forced into obsolescence by the change to color. That is exactly what I try to do with the APRS Spec. That is, add any new feature we want within all the free-fields that have been reserved for future growth without breaking any existing users. >For now - yes, support the Kenwoods. They're >an incredible piece of engineering. We must keep >up the pressure on Kenwood to fix the problems >- and support them by purchasing the upgrades >when they do. But this 1 foot precison that XASTIR insists on at the expense of ALL kenwoods is something WE can FIX. And it has alredy been done in the APRS1.2 !DAO! proposal. If authors would just upgrade their software to this upgraded APRS spec, then all this bellyaching by the XASTIR crowd would be a non issue. They would be able to not only exchange 1 foot precise objects, but also the datum it is based on. AND the thousands of existing Kenwood users would still see EVERYTHING on the air that they currently see. No one loses... Except the XASTIR crowd who wont be able to do as much kenwood bashing... de Wb4APR, Bob
- Previous message: [aprssig] The best resolution of position from APRS
- Next message: [aprssig] The best resolution of ---
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
