[aprssig] The best resolution of position from APRS
Scott Miller scott at opentrac.orgThu Jan 5 00:28:29 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] The best resolution of position from APRS
- Next message: [aprssig] The best resolution of position from APRS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> It does NOT hold anyone back except those who lack > the creativity or willingness to use the ample free-fields > provided for future expansion in just about every format. So do we have a list of 'safe' ratified formats? Those we can implement without worrying about them being yanked in the future? Compressed objects are in the spec, it's not like Xastir came along and decided to do something new. And I've said it before, but if we're going to keep adding extensions, why not come up with a consolidated format? We've got !DAO! and /A= and such, with no consistency in delimiters or anything. If you must tack on more stuff, do it in a uniform manner. Scott N1VG
- Previous message: [aprssig] The best resolution of position from APRS
- Next message: [aprssig] The best resolution of position from APRS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
