[aprssig] Re: FINAL note on the 1 foot precision debate
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduThu Jan 5 14:03:40 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS Meshing
- Next message: [aprssig] Unsusbcribe rbogdan at ursinus.edu
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
When surrounded and everyone is shooting, there are some missplaced shots. First let me say that I appreciate XASTIR as one of the leading currently in-development APRS applications. They did the right thing by making the use of compressed/item/ obects that are incompatible with other systems as a non-default. That is the right thing to do for a depricated format that is not receommended for future use. That is what depricated means in a spec. It means it has recognized problems and should not be used in future designs because of known incompatibilities with existing systems. In its place is the proposed option for future designs by adding the bytes !DAO! to the existing OBJECT format that is 100% backwards compatible to all systems and does not have any of the problems of the depricated version. I would encourage authors to consider it or an agreed alternative or any of the other 3 formats currently in the spec to transmit objects with that precision. de Wb4APR, Bob
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS Meshing
- Next message: [aprssig] Unsusbcribe rbogdan at ursinus.edu
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
