[aprssig] Re: The best resolution of position from APRS
KC2MMi kc2mmi at verizon.netThu Jan 5 23:09:50 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: The best resolution of position from APRS
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: The best resolution of position from APRS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bob- <<No, this [range circles, blobs] has been in APRSdos from the beginning.>> And....for those of us who kissed DOS goodbye despite our love for it a decade ago, what authors besides you have given it ANY consideration? Bill Gates actually lied to IBM when he promised a GUI in the first version of PC-DOS, it wasn't delivered until some time later on and to this day, the graphics capabilities of DOS and DOS systems simply are not up to what other systems are/do. When MS "Live" (the Terraserver) and Google Earth offer DOS versions, then I'll think about running a dedicated DOS box and APRSdos. Sorry, Bob, for me and lot of other people, DOS gets lumped in with Unix and Commodore. All fine things--just not gonna happen here now. I give you credit for "doing it right" but how about getting some college programming class to port APRSdos to Windows as a class programming project? Can you challenge some programmers at Annapolis or anyplace else into doing a project? <<APRSdos does not do this for position ambiguities below 60 feet...>> And that's another problem, with WAAS GPS becoming the standard even for the least expensive GPSes, there's a need to support at least DDD.MM.mmm all the way to the display. Incidentally...Did I miss it? Or did you never explain why or how your DD.MM.HH format differs from the conventional DDD.MM.mm and DDD.MM.mmm to express decimal minutes? I'm still confused over that.
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: The best resolution of position from APRS
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: The best resolution of position from APRS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
