[aprssig] New WIDEn-N explaination please
William McKeehan mckeehan at mckeehan.homeip.netTue Jan 10 17:22:31 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] New WIDEn-N explaination please
- Next message: [aprssig] Spec question (Attended/Unattended bit)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I think I understand a bit more, so some of the digi's along the way are setup to support WIDEn-N, but not the new paradigm. But I still don't understand what happened to the first station that did digi on RELAY. Why would any future digi remove that from the path? On Tue, January 10, 2006 11:20 am, Richard Montgomery said: > Hey William, > > Your correct in that there are 3 digi's before KA4TAR thare are setup > incorrectly.Two dont have WIDE in the UITRACE slot. KA4TAR has WIDE in > UITRACE correctly it seems. > > First and foremost though is N4NEQ-2 is still responding to RELAY which > is the first digi that this station sees most of the time. > > This seems to be his raw packet heard by W4DTR-1 after a dumb RELAY > digi'd his packet first. > K4WZ>SSSV7W,RELAY*,WIDE4-4,qAS,W4DTR-1:'p1zl -/> > > If the digis were setup correctly then his packet would have looked like > K4WZ>SSSV7W,DIGI1,DIGI2,KA4TAR*,WIDE4-1,qAR,WA4DSY:'p1zl -/> > > Well I guess you wouldnt have seen him at all if they were ALL setup > correctly as he is using RELAY. > > So until the digi's between you and this station are updated, its going > to be hard to tell where stations originate unless you look at findu. > > Hope this helps, > Richard > > > William McKeehan wrote: >> There is a new local digi in my area that responds to WIDEn-N (KA4TAR). This >> is the first WIDEn-N digi that I can hear, so I'm learning about the new >> paradigm in the real world. >> >> I've encountered a packet that I do not understand: >> K4WZ>SSSV7W,KA4TAR*,WIDE4-1,qAR,WA4DSY:'p1zl -/> >> >> K4WZ is about 150 miles away from KA4TAR, so I do not think KA4TAR is >> hearing >> K4WZ direct. And looking at the WIDE4-1, it looks like I'm hearing him on >> his >> 3rd hop. >> >> However, looking at K4WZ's packets on the internet, it looks like K4WZ's >> path >> is SOMETHING,WIDE4-4 - that SOMETHING could be WIDE1-1 or RELAY. It looks to >> me like KA4TAR is removing everything in the path that has already been >> used. >> >> I would expect to see something like this: >> K4WZ>SSSV7W,N4NEQ-2*,KA4TAR*,qAR,WA4DSY:'p1zl -/> >> or >> K4WZ>SSSV7W,N4NEQ-2*,KA4TAR*,WIDE4-3,qAR,WA4DSY:'p1zl -/> >> or even >> K4WZ>SSSV7W,N4NEQ-2*,KA4TAR,WIDE4-1,qAR,WA4DSY:'p1zl -/> >> which I was thinking would indicate that some other stations are not >> but I was thinking that >> K4WZ>SSSV7W,KA4TAR*,WIDE4-1,qAR,WA4DSY:'p1zl -/> >> would indicate that KA4TAR heard K4WZ direct and I'm hearing the packet from >> some other digi that has WIDE in UIFLOOD, not UITRACE. >> >> Can someone explain why the path in this packet is showing what I see? Is >> there a setting that KA4TAR can have set in his KPC3 to cause this? >> >> Just trying to understand...thanks! >> > > -- > > APRS Traffic heard on 144.390 in Lexington, TN > http://richdea5.no-ip.org > > Archived APRS traffic > http://richdea5.no-ip.org/usagehistory > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > -- William McKeehan KI4HDU Internet: mckeehan at mckeehan.homeip.net http://mckeehan.homeip.net
- Previous message: [aprssig] New WIDEn-N explaination please
- Next message: [aprssig] Spec question (Attended/Unattended bit)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
