[aprssig] Negative Fuses
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduWed Jan 25 02:51:01 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] World's smallest GPS unit
- Next message: [aprssig] Negative Fuses
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>> rgilson at adelphia.net 01/24/06 7:45 PM >>> > I can't help but wonder why for many many years >Motorola or GE never put a fuse in the ground of >their commercial radios(tubes and transistors). Because you dont need one if you connect the negative lead of the radio independently to FRAME ground near the battery. A failure of the battery connection cannot then damage your radio. But you MUST have a fuse in the negative lead if you connect your negative lead *directly* to the battery. Ham equipment comes with the fuse, because they assume the ham might connect it that way. A pro installer would never do that. Bob, WB4APR I don't remember a single case of a destroyed radio or fire in a vehicle. Kenwood about 15 years ago included a fuse in the negative lead, but before that no one seemed to worry about the "Floating Ground". Has the automotive industry just gotten sloppy or what is the difference? Today many cars and trucks have a heavy ground to the engine block and a light wire to the body. Radio shops always got + directly from the battery and negative from the metal case and a lead to the car frame (no fuse). Today, most radio shops go to the fuse block and any convent metal dash support. WA2WWK Ron
- Previous message: [aprssig] World's smallest GPS unit
- Next message: [aprssig] Negative Fuses
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
