Order Tray | Contact Us | Home | SIG Lists

[aprssig] earthquakes?

Cap Pennell cap at cruzio.com
Mon Jun 12 17:44:03 UTC 2006


I'd rather see the cutoff back at 3.0 (we can feel those) and let that Mt.
Saint Helens watcher use firenet.  hi
73, Cap

P.S.  Curt, I've tried repeatedly but I'm no longer able to email you
direct.  Though I've tried following it's instructions (to allow my
"non-spamming" ISP's IP address), the bounce message always says:
----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to ultra6.eskimo.com.:
>>> DATA
<<< 553 5.3.0 <archer at eskimo.com>... Rejected from 63.249.95.7 - See
http://bl.csma.biz/
550 5.1.1 <archer at eskimo.com>... User unknown
<<< 503 5.0.0 Need RCPT (recipient)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org
> [mailto:aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org]On Behalf Of Curt, WE7U
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 08:34 AM
> To: TAPR APRS Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [aprssig] earthquakes?
>
>
> On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Curt Mills wrote:
>
> > I'm sending quakes down to 2.5 to APRS-IS.  Quakes down to 0.1 to
> > Firenet.
>
> KB7ZVA pointed out that he's seeing quakes down to 2.0 or so on
> APRS-IS.  He is absolutely correct.  I looked at my script again and
> I'm sending 2.0 and above quakes to APRS-IS, 0.1 and above to
> Firenet.  Thanks for the quick note!
>
> As I recall this change was due to a request by a somewhat nearby
> igate operator who wished to gate the quakes for Mt. Saint Helens to
> local RF.  He's hooked into APRS-IS instead of Firenet and wanted to
> gate quakes down to 2.0.
>
> I would say "enjoy the quakes", but I guess it depends on your
> viewpoint and how close you are to them.  ;-)
>
> --
> Curt, WE7U.   APRS Client Comparisons: http://www.eskimo.com/~archer
> "Lotto:    A tax on people who are bad at math." -- unknown
> "Windows:  Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates." -- WE7U
> "The world DOES revolve around me:  I picked the coordinate system!"





More information about the aprssig mailing list