[aprssig] Preliminary delayed packet analysis
Joel Maslak jmaslak-aprs at antelope.netFri Jun 16 13:00:26 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] Preliminary delayed packet analysis
- Next message: [aprssig] Preliminary delayed packet analysis
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Jun 15, 2006, at 9:08 PM, Stan - N0YXV wrote: > I think it might just open the eyes of some of the people that > still think > WIDE5-5 is a good idea. No, they'd just be proud that they got gated 250 times with that really powerful VHF signal. ;) I see a few people doing things like: WIDE3-3,WIDE3-3,WIDE3-3 as paths. Clearly some digi somewhere is trapping WIDE4+... One of these is a weather station!!! Of all things I care about, the weather 500 miles away is not one of them! I don't see that type of behavior changing regarding IGates with education, unfortunately. That said, I do think it would give considerate operators an idea of their local network.
- Previous message: [aprssig] Preliminary delayed packet analysis
- Next message: [aprssig] Preliminary delayed packet analysis
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
