[aprssig] Preliminary delayed packet analysis
VE7GDH ve7gdh at rac.caSun Jun 18 00:19:28 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] Preliminary delayed packet analysis
- Next message: [aprssig] Dead Reckoning in APRS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Pete AE5PL wrote... > This is not a question of "horsepower". As I stated before, it is a > question of what breaks when you do this (like messaging). It is also a > question of getting 400+ sysops to do make this change (I have no idea > if aprsD even has this as an option). So, IMO it is not worth the > effort simply to mask the problems (and make them harder to diagnose) > especially when you will introduce new problems with this "fix". Ah - I get it now. It's not just a simple change of one script on one server. I did understand your previous message about how it would just basking the real problem and I agree that the real fix is to fix the problem and not just mask it. I just thought if I asked one more time - hi! 73 es cul - Keith VE7GDH -- "I may be lost, but I know exactly where I am!"
- Previous message: [aprssig] Preliminary delayed packet analysis
- Next message: [aprssig] Dead Reckoning in APRS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
