[aprssig] Graphics
Wes Johnston wes at kd4rdb.comThu Mar 2 16:20:23 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] Graphics
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS/CE Development & Compatibility?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
The reason for the limit is quick basic was discontinued over 10 years ago. Even then it only supported minimal graphics that you see, and 2 comports at 9600 baud. Some "little" thing called VB replaced it. http://www.tapr.org/~kb2scs/aprsscs.html seems to be filling the gap by carefully following the function and features of DOS aprs but in a windows environment. Wes ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robbie - WA9INF" <mwrobertson at comcast.net> To: "TAPR APRS Special Interest Group" <aprssig at lists.tapr.org> Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 11:03 AM Subject: [aprssig] Graphics > Hi all, > > I may be missing something, so I'll pose the question.. > > APRS for dos may cover many bases, or all of them, but why are the > graphics still lingering in the 1980s? When I use it and have some of the > many rings, stations, tracks being displayed, the maps become so cluttered > and unreadable it's awful.. This is with most any map I've tried. > > I think if the resolution of the image were more like the current monitors > resolution of 800x640 or higher, that the screen of Dos APRS could be made > higher?? > > Is there a setting when initiating DosAPRS that sets the screen > resolution? > > Why isn't there a better screen display in this program after all these > years? > > Robbie > > > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig >
- Previous message: [aprssig] Graphics
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS/CE Development & Compatibility?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
