[aprssig] Coast Guard Hunts Prankster Behind 'Sinking'DistressCalls

[scott at opentrac.org]

Yeah, figured that was the only thing that really made sense.  Got my 1-wire
humidity code done, need to get it posted and documented.

Scott
N1VG 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Bruninga [mailto:bruninga at usna.edu] 
> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 9:07 AM
> To: aprssig at lists.tapr.org; scott at opentrac.org
> Subject: RE: [aprssig] Coast Guard Hunts Prankster Behind 
> 'Sinking'DistressCalls
> 
> Humidity is suppsosed to be relative.
> I think we only have two bytes for 00 to 99
> bob
> 
> >>> scott at opentrac.org 03/06/06 1:11 AM >>>
> Made me think of this one:
> 
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-890218145934088002 
> 
> And for an on-topic question while I'm at it, is humidity in 
> the APRS WX
> spec supposed to be absolute, relative, or is it just not specified?
> 
> Scott
> N1VG 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org 
> > [mailto:aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Gooden
> > Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2006 8:35 PM
> > To: aprssig at lists.tapr.org 
> > Subject: [aprssig] Coast Guard Hunts Prankster Behind 
> > 'Sinking' DistressCalls
> > 
> > See the full story at:
> > 
> > http://www.local6.com/news/7695412/detail.html 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > aprssig mailing list
> > aprssig at lists.tapr.org 
> > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at lists.tapr.org 
> https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
> 
> 
>