[aprssig] RE: Marrying Doppler & APRS
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduMon Mar 20 22:24:25 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] Marrying Doppler & APRS, OOPS!
- Next message: [aprssig] Tracker Smart Pathing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>> noskosteve at yahoo.com 03/20/06 5:00 PM >>> >> ... The distance field for a DF line is important >>to limit the bearing lines to only that area of >>interest and not infinitly long. >> ... This vastly improves the visibility of the maps ... >>otherwise, an observer looking at a 128 mile range >scale map would see total gyberish, > > As usual, Bob, a good idea. Yes, it only took one replay of an event at the wrong scale to realize that the vectors have to be a length appropriate to the area of interest as we were circling as we homed in on the fox, or it makes no sense at other map scales. With DF vectors limited to the approximate range of the fox, At the 2 mile scale, you see short vectors directed INWARD to where the fox is. But at the 32 mile scale and with full screen DF vectors, the SAME vectors appear to be a nonsense bearing line in all directions of the compas OUTWARD and the viewer makes no sense whatsover. That is why I am so very disappointed that other APRS software does not use the standard RANGE SCALE for all map descriptions to make sure that different viewers are "on the same page" so to speak when they are looking at maps! de WB4APR, Bob
- Previous message: [aprssig] Marrying Doppler & APRS, OOPS!
- Next message: [aprssig] Tracker Smart Pathing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
