[aprssig] Tracker Smart Pathing
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduTue Mar 21 17:13:40 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] Tracker Smart Pathing
- Next message: [aprssig] Tracker Smart Pathing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>...this ... should be a function of the 'Network' >>It only means changing the code in every Digi >> Basically, I should be able to set my path to AUTO ... >> and the network then ensures that my packets make >> it as far as the nearest I-Gate... > >I could easily add a rewrite option to my digi code >that'd ... substitute something for AUTO...when >it's received by the digi. [such as the path to the >nearest IGate]... This always sounds great on paper, but my experience is that it *never* works in amateur radio practice in the long run. When anything requires a volunteer SYSOP to make frequent updates in response to changing conditions in the local area (the IGate changes). It works OK for a while, then the sysop gets busy with other things and you find out it goes from days to weeks to months before you can get the digi owner to change his parameters to the "latest" (each time an IGate comes or goes). The result is "it should work" but in fact it completely fails for the period between the time that something in the network changes until ALL local SYSOPS have updated their digis settings to make it work again. Also, only the sender of a packet knows what he wants it to do, not the DIGI sysop who has to define it according to a single rule (which may be right or wrong for this user). Again, I am not knocking the concept at all, But just in practice, in many areas, dependence on sysop settings and updates for somthing to work, is a plan for less reliability in my experience in Ham radio. Just a thought. de Wb4APR, Bob
- Previous message: [aprssig] Tracker Smart Pathing
- Next message: [aprssig] Tracker Smart Pathing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
