[aprssig] On flow control/smart beaconing...
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduTue Mar 21 21:33:50 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] Tracker Smart Pathing
- Next message: [aprssig] On flow control/smart beaconing...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>.... I'm running a 5W transmitter, and get maybe >>2 of my 50 packets digipeated in the LA area... > >It's not an anomaly. Perhaps the real solution here >is to optimize these yet-to-be-invented smart digi's >so that they keep xx% of the air-space available >for these stations to make it into the network. But the digis have no control over limiting what others transmit to them. There is nothing that a digi can do to limit congestion and collisions that it hears no matter how smart it is. The congestion has to be limited at the source or at firewqalls surrounding big density areas (that is what the New-N paradigm does with the high-N traps. >I can see human nature getting in the way of this >[smart digi] scheme though: If people try a few test >transmissions and some of them don't get digipeated >because the digi's are throttling back... these people >will most likely crank up their power level and rate Yep. My point eactly and we see it every single time we contct someone with excessive rates. He says " but that is what I have to do to get in"... I say again, smart digipeating looks good on paper but is full of pit falls in practice... Bob
- Previous message: [aprssig] Tracker Smart Pathing
- Next message: [aprssig] On flow control/smart beaconing...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
