[aprssig] Re: Tracker Smart Pathing: user types, alternatives
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduThu Mar 23 13:42:05 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: Tracker Smart Pathing: user types, alternatives
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: Tracker Smart Pathing: user types, alternatives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>> apratt at bestbits.org 03/22/06 10:22 PM >>> >Here's another:..."I wish to be seen on findu as >I travel widely in both urban and remote areas." >... reason... is domestic tranquility... > Proportional pathing is not so good for me either. Two counter arguemnts: a) But is your wife really looking at FINDU every single minute when you are 150 miles away working through 3 digiepatrers? Why is not 8 minute updates in that scenario just as good 99% of the time (when it saves QRM to everyone else by a factor of 8)? b) If your goal -is- FINDU, most packets get into FINDU via one hop or maybe 2. So you would get 2 minute updates most of the time. I doubt any wife is watching for that every 1 minute packet... So, 8 times the QRM using a fixed rate of 1 minute or proportional pathing and almost as good most of the time. de WB4APR, Bob
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: Tracker Smart Pathing: user types, alternatives
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: Tracker Smart Pathing: user types, alternatives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
