[aprssig] Re: Fill-in Digis
John Ronan jronan at tssg.orgFri Mar 24 17:04:36 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: Tracker Smart Pathing: user types, alternatives
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: Tracker Smart Pathing: user types, alternatives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > The thing that most people overlook about fill-in > digis, is that the concept gives us a 2 tier tool > to balance the ability of a distant mobile "geting > into a digi" compard to his ability to hear a digi. > There is a huge inbalance here, And I mean BIG. > The Fill-in digi attempts to better balance that > situation. THink of the tier of out-lying fill-in > digis as just like a big voice repeater with remote > site receivers. > > Please consider: > 1) A mobile's ability to get into a big digi the > farther out from it he is, is *mostly* limiited > in his lack-of-ability to hit the digi strong > enough to overcome all the surrounding > QRM from all other digis and all other stations. > 2) But he hears the digi just fine at the same > distant location. Howdy, What we have experienced is exactly the opposite, I can get into the Digi, but not be able to decode the forwarded on packet (can hear it/ see the S meter rise though). > The FILL-in digi being closer to him will pick up > his signal quite well and give it a better chance > of getting into the big digi. But, being a fill-in > digi, it will NOT add to the QRM by making > unneeded copies of 100% of all the other > traffic on the channel. Ok, as we say over here "I stand under you now", thats a subtle point, worth remembering, but I think what we have experienced, being the opposite of what you seem to experience only makes for an asymmetric network, which would be/is confusing for users. >> In fact I think I'm just going to recommend >> that to WIDE2-2 should be the default. > [snip] > What this does is tie your hands at requiring > every digi to always digipeate 100% of As our experiences differ, we will agree to differ for the moment, if our network ever gets that busy here, we'll hopefully have a better 'moustrap' built to deal with it :) With the deployment we have coming up next weekend (10-15 trackers on two sides of a mountain range, all back to one ICP), I may have to change my tune afterwards. Regards de John EI7IG -- John Ronan <jronan at tssg.org>, +353-51-302938 Telecommunications Software & Systems Group, http://www.tssg.org
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: Tracker Smart Pathing: user types, alternatives
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: Tracker Smart Pathing: user types, alternatives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
