[aprssig] Re: Tracker Smart Pathing: user types, alternatives
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduFri Mar 24 17:25:20 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: Tracker Smart Pathing: user types, alternatives
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: Tracker Smart Pathing: user types,alternatives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>> dave at emv.co.uk 03/24/06 12:20 PM >>> >Surely it would be better to make the network >intelligent enough to route posits as needed Ah, but that is the BIG problem. "WHERE?" Some people think "to an IGate" others want to their friend 2 or 3 or 4 hops away. Some do not even want IGates and all their potential wrong setings adding QRM to their area. My point is that APRS has as many varried applications as there are HAMs and *any* attempt at an intelligent networks ASSUMES that there is ONE answer as to where everyone's packts should go. I disagree completely. Only the SENDER knows where he wants his packets to go... Bob
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: Tracker Smart Pathing: user types, alternatives
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: Tracker Smart Pathing: user types,alternatives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
