[aprssig] Some notes & IGATE questions for the IGATE gurus
Jeff Thomas - KD4EVB kd4evb at yahoo.comSat Mar 25 20:38:22 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: aprssig Digest, Vol 21, Issue 27
- Next message: [aprssig] Some notes & IGATE questions for the IGATE gurus
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To start with, here in the Ohio Valley/Northern Kentucky area I find that WIDE1-1,WIDE2-1 works extremely well for a mobile path. I think the New Paradigm change has done a lot for improving reliability of things on the RF side. Looks like many area sysops are slow (or unaware, hard to tell) to change over to the new system (for whatever the reason). A 5w tracker gets out very well when just a few years ago it was very hit and miss on RF due mostly to channel loading and heavy adjacent area QRM at the digi receiver wiping your low level tracker signal out a the digi. My only fear is that this is a stop gap measure that will eventually hit it's limits within a few years if area activity returns. Many of the locals gave up on ARPS in the 2001-2003 time frame as it was just too unreliable. Some are returning, and I figure in a few years things will be loading up pretty heavy again. Seems to me we need to come up with much better "smarter" digi's (and maybe trakers, grin), do some user education, and other ways of making things easy for the users to use without making it easy for the users to clobber the rf side of things ;-) I'm glad to see that there is at least some discussion of smarter digi's underway on the list. I figure once 99% of the digis are on the new system, the improvements will be even more noticeable. Why the slow conversion in this area? Beats me, my gut feeling is that it's probably 75% lack of good communication and no area leadership between all the digi sysops....something I haven't had to time to ask around about. Now for an IGATE question. Can you have too many IGATEs in an area? By this I don't mean a hundred igates within a few miles (that would be obvious overkill). Are you better off with say dozen or more local home stations gating things into the system versus just one or two well located IGATEs? Does having a pile of home stations gating everything on rf into the system confuse or degrade the ability for return messages getting back out on local RF? In my area and immediate surrounding area, one of the biggest complaints I hear is the reliability of getting into IGATES regardless of path (although a lot of the time it forces folks to crank up their hop counts). From what I see, we've got more than a few igates in the area that apparently they don't hear the digi's well and/or the digi doesn't hear them too well, the later is probably the issue. Reliability of getting out of area messages into and out of the IGATE system seems to vary a lot from day to day. While I haven't done any testing myself in awhile, I think the main issue is that of reliability of getting "return" (acks, replies, etc) messages back onto local RF from the IGATE system. Just curious what the thoughts are of those much more savvy on the pros/cons of the IGATE system are? Thanks in advance. 73 de Jeff, KD4EVB __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: aprssig Digest, Vol 21, Issue 27
- Next message: [aprssig] Some notes & IGATE questions for the IGATE gurus
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
