[aprssig] An Anniversary Cheer for Stephen Smith
Ron Stordahl ron.stordahl at digikey.comTue Mar 28 23:24:55 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] An Anniversary Cheer for Stephen Smith
- Next message: [aprssig] An Anniversary Cheer for Stephen Smith
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Lance: High digi's also must respond to WIDE1-1, thus when the initial packet of WIDE1-1,WIDE3-3 is heard by a high digi, which will typically be the most common case, it will repeat it with WIDE1-1 used up, but followed by WIDE3-3 which will provide for three additional hops. Thus WIDE1-1,WIDE3-3 is in most cases a 4 hop path for the current configuration of digi's in a N=3 area. And thus the limit has been broken. Ron, N5IN J. Lance Cotton wrote: > Ron Stordahl wrote: >> My only issue with the WIDE1-1 replacement for RELAY is that, for >> example, in an N=3 area via WIDE1-1,WIDE3-3 results in 4 hops. >> Wouldn't it be better to set up the high digi's to limit N=2 and >> recommend to everyone they use WIDE1-1,WIDE2-2. N=2 and N=4 areas >> would have corresponding settings. In most instances high digi's >> themselves could limit their maximum beacon to WIDE2-2 and reach an >> IGate. > > Isn't the idea of "RELAY" (now WIDE1-1) to be the fly-by-night fill-in > home stations that help to get mobile users out into the "real world" > of digipeaters? > > After your relay by WIDE1-1 boosts you into digi territory, *then* you > have 3 hops (or whatever you set/limit). You wouldn't count the relay > as a hop, since it is essentially an amplifier for your weak mobile. > > -Lance KJ5O >
- Previous message: [aprssig] An Anniversary Cheer for Stephen Smith
- Next message: [aprssig] An Anniversary Cheer for Stephen Smith
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
