[aprssig] Re: [nwaprssig] 9600B UHF APRS
Phillip B. Pacier ad6nh at arrl.netSat Oct 7 05:28:49 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: [nwaprssig] 9600B UHF APRS
- Next message: [aprssig] GPS receiver sale
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
438.975 9600 baud in the So Cal Area 73 Phil - AD6NH David Dobbins wrote: > The issue I have with multiple frequencies is finding out what the > freq is when travelling through the area of coverage. You'll need yet > another call book or some document listing the freqs. If you're a > regular traveler you'll likely not use the UHF side because it's too > hard to keep track of all the freqs. The nice thing about the common > freq 144.39 on VHF is I can hop in the car, set the tracker up, and > go, and not have to change anything along the way. One option that > will help that, and I think we should start doing this in the Puget > Sound area, is to announce on the 144.39 freq the availability of UHF > APRS on 440.875. I will adjust my beacon here in Spokane. > > If 440.875 is available in your area, use it. If not, pick another > freq where APRS/packet falls into your band plan. Tell the rest of us > so we can update a web page and local listings. > > I don't believe we'll ever settle on one UHF freq for APRS. It would > be more important to not delay the UHF growth, pick a freq and go with > it, and announce to the world via BLN or ANN and web page listing the > UHF info. > > I would like to see all the big metro cities (you know where they are) > to put up a UHF APRS digi and capability to uplink to the APRS-IS via > an iGate. > > Since this post is new to the aprssig, you can get more info on the > NWAPRS exploits of UHF APRS on our website: http://www.nwaprs.info and > check the table of contents. > > Dave K7GPS > 53 to Bill > > On 10/6/06, wa7nwp at jnos.org <wa7nwp at jnos.org> wrote: >> > Yep, this will be a helluva lot harder finding a common UHF frequency. >> > We need to get a national effort going toward identifying and adopting >> > a common UHF APRS frequency that will work in North America at least; >> > the rest of the world preferably. >> > >> > Dave >> >> Dave and I have a different opinion about this. I don't see any need to >> have a common frequency. With our technology, ANY frequency will work. >> If you're as twisted an old bull as I am, you'll want to use ALL the >> frequencies... Use it or lose it. Quiet air is wasted air. Received >> (indirectly) a 73K picture file by 1200 baud packet last night. Wasn't >> much quiet air time on that channel. Hope to be doing the same on >> 223.400 >> tonight! >> >> 53's >> Bill/Dill, WA7NWP >> >> _______________________________________________ >> nwaprssig mailing list >> nwaprssig at nwaprs.info >> http://www.nwaprs.info/mailman/listinfo/nwaprssig >> > > -- Phillip Pacier - AD6NH APRS Tier 2 Coordinator Sales Associate Baker to Vegas Digital Coordinator Ham Radio Outlet, Anaheim www.aprs2.net 714-533-7373 www.aprsca.net 800-854-6046 www.b2vtracking.com
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: [nwaprssig] 9600B UHF APRS
- Next message: [aprssig] GPS receiver sale
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
