[aprssig] Low band APRS (was Re: 9600b UHF APRS IS THE FUTURE OFAPRS)
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduTue Oct 10 17:59:05 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] Low band APRS (was Re: 9600b UHF APRS IS THE FUTURE OF APRS)
- Next message: [aprssig] Low band APRS (was Re: 9600b UHF APRS IS THE FUTUREOFAPRS)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > My pet peeve is that there is no 10 meter > > FM 1200 BPS packet frequency. For rural areas *that* > > is the ticket with plenty of surplus hi power "low band" > > commercial stuff available. I used to think that as well, but I finally got a 10m rig and put it in the car and then put a beaocn on the roof at work into a 5/8 wave vertical on a metal roof. I was absolutely astonished when I drove home that the range was LESS than 2 meters! Maybe I was doing something wrong, but I gave up. It wanst worth it. And I was using SSB mode and not FM (I actually wanst trying to decode packets, just see how far I could HEAR it. And the range was so miserable compared to 2m, that I never persued it.. I think the reason the Highway Patrol gets good range at 30 MHz is because they have really tall antenna towers and can put several vertical elements to give them some gain at 30 MHz. Then they are also not in an urban environment but the open road. But if anyone can prove me wrong here, I woiuld love to find a way to use the 10m band. But NOT FM. There are not enough FM channels on the 10m band to be able to afford one for APRS, (I don't think) I may be wrong there too, but during the good sunspot cycle, I bet and APRS channel would be useless and opposed by most. De WB4APR, Bob
- Previous message: [aprssig] Low band APRS (was Re: 9600b UHF APRS IS THE FUTURE OF APRS)
- Next message: [aprssig] Low band APRS (was Re: 9600b UHF APRS IS THE FUTUREOFAPRS)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
