[aprssig] Low band APRS (was Re: 9600b UHF APRS IS THE FUTURE OFAPRS)
Ben Jackson ben at ben.comTue Oct 10 19:53:22 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] Low band APRS (was Re: 9600b UHF APRS IS THE FUTUREOFAPRS)
- Next message: [aprssig] Low band APRS (was Re: 9600b UHF APRS IS THE FUTUREOFAPRS)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:59:05PM -0400, Robert Bruninga wrote: > > I used to think that as well, but I finally got a 10m rig and > put it in the car and then put a beaocn on the roof at work into > a 5/8 wave vertical on a metal roof. I was absolutely > astonished when I drove home that the range was LESS than 2 > meters! I was working on a simple 30m beacon (see some earlier messages on this list) and when it worked the range was great, but the band only opened up for me a few times a day, at least at 5 watts. It also required a good antenna. What I wanted to do with it was up the power a bit and make use it in an ocean buoy, but given the reduced efficiency I was going to get from a short vertical, and the relative lack of 30m gates, I figured it would not be very effective. > But if anyone can prove me wrong here, I woiuld love to find a > way to use the 10m band. But NOT FM. There are not enough FM > channels on the 10m band to be able to afford one for APRS, One thing that quickly became clear on 30m was that 200Hz SSB tone spacing requires a very precise oscillator. For unattended APRS operation at 30m you're talking 1 or 2ppm accuracy. At 10m you'd have to do even better. It almost requires a GPS source that provides some kind of time discipline you can use with the transmitter. -- Ben Jackson AD7GD <ben at ben.com> http://www.ben.com/
- Previous message: [aprssig] Low band APRS (was Re: 9600b UHF APRS IS THE FUTUREOFAPRS)
- Next message: [aprssig] Low band APRS (was Re: 9600b UHF APRS IS THE FUTUREOFAPRS)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
