[aprssig] Bandwidth IS THE FUTURE OF APRS
A.J. Farmer (AJ3U) farmer.aj at gmail.comThu Oct 12 18:30:08 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] Bandwidth IS THE FUTURE OF APRS
- Next message: [aprssig] Cell Phone APRS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 10/12/06, wa7nwp <wa7nwp at jnos.org> wrote: > We have to change the way we look at things. > > YouTube feeds 100 MILLION!!! Videos a day. Those Videos are in > Megabytes. (You all saw the dramatic 4th episode of Chad Vader - right?) I agree that higher bandwidth is needed for other applications, but not for APRS. "End User" APRS at 1200bps is a good match of needs vs. readily available and cheap equipment. APRS does not need additional bandwidth to perform within its primary scope and designed function. Increase the bandwidth or operating frequency and you increase the complexity and cost of an already robust network. There are plenty of applications that would benefit from higher bandwidth and higher frequencies and I'm all for that, but in my opinion APRS should be kept "simple" because it functions better that way. -- A.J. Farmer, AJ3U http://www.aj3u.com
- Previous message: [aprssig] Bandwidth IS THE FUTURE OF APRS
- Next message: [aprssig] Cell Phone APRS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
